Our attorneys have resubmitted their amended complaint, near as I can tell unaltered, with an updated memo of law that presumably now addresses what the court said was the applicable law.  We’ll see how this goes.

WP will no doubt respond with pretty much the same objection that they made to the first one.  That the email segments are out of context, that there are other emails indicating that the 600,000 gpd breakout that they discussed was caused by a surveying error that was subsequently corrected, and that the allegations lack specificity.

The court has also granted the five month extension.